Reduction of ischemic brain injury in rats with normothermic and hyperthermic conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECT: Statins have been used for induction of ischemic tolerance after cerebral ischemia. The authors have previously shown that simvastatin is protective after ischemic cerebral injury in normothermic conditions. In this study they further examined whether treatment with simvastatin can reduce ischemic brain injury in a hyperthermic condition. METHODS: Focal ischemic brain injury was induced by embolizing a preformed clot into the middle cerebral artery in rats. The authors initially examined whether treatment with simvastatin could reduce ischemic brain injury without or with hyperthermia. The infarct volume, edema, and neurological deficits were examined. They then studied whether simvastatin could reduce the perfusion deficits, damage to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and degeneration of neurons in the ischemic injured brain. RESULTS: Simvastatin significantly reduced the infarct volume in both normothermic and hyperthermic conditions, compared with appropriate controls. Concomitantly, this treatment also significantly reduced neurological deficits and brain edema. Administration of simvastatin significantly decreased perfusion deficits, BBB permeability, and degenerated neurons. CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that simvastatin is an effective agent for ischemic brain injury not only in normothermic but also in hyperthermic conditions, which may be through the decrease of BBB permeability, degenerated neurons, and perfusion deficits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".