Effect of different induction strategies on effector, regulatory and memory lymphocyte sub-populations in clinical islet transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This prospective study assessed lymphocyte subsets in the peripheral blood of 42 islet allograft recipients using flow cytometry from 2 weeks and up to 2 years post-transplantation. Subjects received daclizumab (n = 16), Thymoglobulin (n = 12) or alemtuzumab (n = 14). Alemtuzumab was associated with an early (within 1 month) and transient (up to 6 months) increase in the frequency of CD3(+) CD4(+) Foxp3(+) T cells, while daclizumab induced a near complete loss of these cells (P <or= 0.001). The frequency of memory CD4(+) T cells was increased following depleting immunosuppression induction with either Thymoglobulin or alemtuzumab (P <or= 0.05), but remained unchanged while using daclizumab. Alemtuzumab induction resulted in a significant loss of memory B lymphocytes when compared with the other induction groups (P
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".