Effect of different induction strategies on effector, regulatory and memory lymphocyte sub-populations in clinical islet transplantation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This prospective study assessed lymphocyte subsets in the peripheral blood of 42 islet allograft recipients using flow cytometry from 2 weeks and up to 2 years post-transplantation. Subjects received daclizumab (n = 16), Thymoglobulin (n = 12) or alemtuzumab (n = 14). Alemtuzumab was associated with an early (within 1 month) and transient (up to 6 months) increase in the frequency of CD3(+) CD4(+) Foxp3(+) T cells, while daclizumab induced a near complete loss of these cells (P <or= 0.001). The frequency of memory CD4(+) T cells was increased following depleting immunosuppression induction with either Thymoglobulin or alemtuzumab (P <or= 0.05), but remained unchanged while using daclizumab. Alemtuzumab induction resulted in a significant loss of memory B lymphocytes when compared with the other induction groups (P <or= 0.001). While the clinical significance of these findings remains to be fully determined, the observed altered balance between effector, regulatory and memory cells suggests that the immune status of patients will be affected according to the induction strategy chosen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it