Single photons from relativistic collisions of lead nuclei at energies available at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS): A reanalysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a reanalysis of single photon production from a relativistic collision of lead nuclei at CERN SPS measured by the WA98 experiment. The refinements include use of isospin and shadowing corrected NLO pQCD treatment for prompt photon production using an optimized scale for factorization, renormalization, and fragmentation and use of hydrodynamics suited for noncentral collisions along with a well tested equation of state admitting a quark-hadron phase transition. A quantitative explanation of the data requires a large initial temperature (at a small formation time of about 0.2 fm/$c$) and a moderate increase in the prompt yield which could perhaps be attributed to the Cronin effect in nuclei. The data can also be explained using a moderate initial temperature (at a formation time of about 1 fm/$c$) with a very large $K$-factor multiplying the prompt yield. We show that different initial times give rise to different values for the elliptic flow parameter ${v}_{2}$ for thermal photons. We also argue that a measurement of ${v}_{2}$ for thermal photons could also distinguish between the scenarios with or without a phase transition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".