Bibliographic record
Abstract
Austrian Economy Grows 0.4% in 2013, with Activity Quickening at Year-End1 Austria’s economy performed fairly well in 2012 and 2013, considering that the euro area was in recession. Real GDP growth was admittedly very subdued in Austria, but nevertheless positive, whereas output declined in ten euro area countries at least in one of the two years. However, the recovery is increasingly gaining a foothold across the globe. In the second quarter of 2013, the euro area also emerged from recession. The Austrian economy remained sluggish throughout the first half of 2013. Declining net real wages and flat consumer confidence dampened consumer spending. Despite excellent financing conditions, gross fixed capital formation contracted at the beginning of 2013, as sales prospects were poor. Moreover, companies reduced stocks, which stifled growth additionally. Net export expanded at a lackluster pace. In the second half of 2013, Austria’s economy overcame stagnation and slowly began to recover moderately in the wake of the revival of global activity. Following an increase by 0.2% in the third quarter of 2013, Austrian output grew by 0.3% in the fourth quarter against the previous quarter (national accounts data; in real terms, seasonally and working-day adjusted). All demand components – now including private consumption – posted positive growth in the fourth quarter of 2013 for the first time in that year. Exports increased all four quarters of the year and gained momentum quarter on quarter. Gross fixed capital consumption growth had already returned to positive territory in the second quarter of 2013. Changes in inventories have come to zero since mid-2013, appearing to signal the end of destocking for the time being. Real GDP growth ran to 0.4% in 2013 (in real terms, seasonally adjusted; Christian Ragacs1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".