MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1496704319 · doi:10.1080/14634988.2012.727675

Assessing the fish consumption beneficial use impairment in the Bay of Quinte

2012· article· en· W1496704319 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jeffrey J. Ridal, M. Brian C. Hickey, Jérôme Marty, Satyendra P. Bhavsar

Bibliographic record

VenueAquatic Ecosystem Health & Management · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksSt. Lawrence River Institute of Environmental Sciences
FundersMinistry of Education, IndiaMinistry of Earth Sciences
KeywordsBayPerchFisheryEnvironmental scienceMercury (programming language)Fish consumptionChristian ministryBass (fish)Fish <Actinopterygii>BiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The state of contamination in Bay of Quinte fish was assessed to determine whether delisting criteria have been met, and to recommend further studies/actions to be undertaken. We examined fish contaminant data collected by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment between 1975 and 2008 for seven sites in Lake Ontario including the Bay of Quinte. Where sufficient data was available, we tested for differences in recent years by examining the post-1998 data for Walleye, Smallmouth Bass, Yellow Perch and Brown Bullhead. Our analysis specifically focused on known contaminants of concern within the Bay of Quinte: polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury (Hg), as well as Mirex which is known to originate from Lake Ontario. Insufficient data was available for the examination of total TEQs (dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs). When appropriate, we used the general linear model (GLM) to compare contaminant concentrations among sites as a function of fish length. When no significant relationship between contaminant concentration and fish length was found, mean values among sites were compared using analysis of variance. While there were no significant differences for the majority of contaminants among sites, some species and contaminant combinations at one or more of the Bay of Quinte sites had elevated fish concentrations compared to some reference sites. For instance, mercury concentrations in Yellow Perch and Brown Bullhead at Quinte sites exceeded those from some reference sites. Current consumption restrictions for Brown Bullhead and Yellow Perch are more severe in the Upper Bay of Quinte compared to the other sites, indicating impacts of local sources. As a result, the fish consumption beneficial use impairment continues to be classified as impaired for the Bay of Quinte. As many sport fish such as Walleye and Smallmouth Bass are large, long-lived and potentially wide-ranging species, it is difficult to link contaminant concentrations to local sources. To investigate the impact of sources within the Upper Bay of Quinte, comparison of contaminants in sentinel fish collected on the same scale as the source of the contamination is recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAquatic Ecosystem Health & ManagementSame topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207