MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Professional Boundaries: A Matter of Therapeutic Integrity

2002· article· en· W149674146 on OpenAlexaff
Cindy Peternelj‐Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfessional boundariesMeaning (existential)Therapeutic relationshipPower (physics)PsychologySpace (punctuation)Engineering ethicsNursingMedicineEpistemologyPsychotherapistComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Establishing and maintaining boundaries creates a relational space in which the patient and nurse are able to explore treatment issues within the safety of the therapeutic relationship. 2. The therapeutic relationship in founded on the basis of trust, respect, and appropriate use of power. Understanding the power differential within the nurse patient relationship is critical to the establishment and maintenance of professional boundaries. 3. Therapeutic integrity is rooted in knowledge, experience, and clinical judgment. As such, there are not always clearly demarcated answers to the tough questions posed by the dilemmas in practice. 4. Questions arising from practice challenge nurses to reflect on the meaning of boundaries in their personal and professional lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.102
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.102
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.110
Scholarly communication0.0240.026
Open science0.0030.018
Research integrity0.0120.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health ServicesSame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207