MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Retinal phospholipase C from squid is a regulator of Gqα GTPase activity

2001· article· en· W1497697383 on OpenAlexafffund
Linnia H. Mayeenuddin, Christine Bamsey, Jane Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsPhospholipase CGTP'GTPaseVisual phototransductionGq alpha subunitBiologyG proteinCell biologyBiochemistryPhospholipaseGuanosine triphosphateSignal transductionEnzymeRetinal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phospholipase C (PLC) pathway is the major signaling mechanism of photoactivation in invertebrate photoreceptors. Here we report the cloning of a cDNA encoding a 140-kDa retinal PLC that is uniquely expressed in squid photoreceptors. This cDNA encodes a protein with multiple distinct modular domains: PH, X and Y catalytic, and C2 domains, as well as G- and P-box motifs and two GTP/ATP binding motifs. The PLC was stimulated by activated squid Gq alpha but not by squid Gq beta gamma or mammalian beta gamma subunits. The PLC was inhibited by monophosphate, diphosphate and triphosphate nucleotides but not cyclic nucleosides. We also tested the ability of PLC-140 to regulate the GTPase activity of Gq alpha in the rhabdomeric membranes. Depletion of PLC-140 from the rhabdomeric membranes decreased the GTP hydrolysis but not GTP gamma S binding to the membranes. Reconstitution of purified PLC-140 with membranes accelerated Gq alpha GTPase activity by fivefold at a concentration of 2.5 microM. Our data suggest that PLC-140 plays an important role in both the activation and inactivation pathways of invertebrate visual transduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207