MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1497730443

Shady Transactions: Three Essays on the Underground Economy

2005· dissertation· en· W1497730443 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lindsay M. Tedds

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomyEngineeringEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The term "underground economy" refers to output that is produced, and income that is generated, by agents who hide this fact from authorities. There has been a recent resurgence in interest in the underground economy and this interest has predominantly been stimulated by the perception that the underground economy is sizeable and growing. This dissertation is comprised of three essays, the goals of which are to provide empirical measures of underground activity. The first paper in this dissertation applies a modeling technique that treats the underground economy as an unobservable or latent variable and incorporates multiple indicator and multiple causal (MIMIC) variables to estimate a time-path of the size of broadly defined underground economy. Using macroeconomic Canadian data, the results indicate that the underground economy grew steadily over the sample period: from 7.5% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 1976 to about 15.3% in 2001. The second paper uses microeconomic data and proposes a nonparametric expenditure-based approach to obtain estimates of income under-reporting by self- employed households. The approach is illustrated by estimating the effect of the Canadian Goods and Services Tax (GST) on income under-reporting. It is found that the difference between true and reported self-employment income is larger for households at the lower end of the self-employment income distribution and that there was no statistically significant change in under-reporting behaviour following the implementation of the GST. The third paper investigates the characteristics of businesses that engage in tax non-compliance using a survey of firms from around the world. Overall, small firms tend to be less compliant than larger firms. In addition, foreign owned firms, exporters, and firms that have audited financial statements are found to be more compliant but quite surprisingly, government ownership does not result in increased tax compliance. Finally, the existence of organized crime, high taxes, and government corruption all result in lower compliance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207