MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1498217291

위화(余華) 소설의 한국 수용에 대하여

2015· article· ko· W1498217291 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
전성욱

Bibliographic record

Venue중국현대문학 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Culture and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPopularityDestiny (ISS module)HistoryNarrativeLiteratureAestheticsSociologyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the aspects which have been accommodated in this novel Yu Hua in Korea. Among the Chinese modern novel published in Korea and analyze the reasons novel Yu Hua are the most popular. Yu Hua has achieved sustained response during more than 10 years from our readers in Korea. Korea’s culture and the acquaintance with the artists is one of the reasons. South Korea is one of frequently visited by readers and also familiar reasons. But his popularity is more than what can be found in the epic qualities inherent in his novels. His novels adds to the weight of historical reality in the form of capacity of feature-length narrative. Military dictatorship and after a workout Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution and galaxies The past Korea industrialization The past is similar to the modern history of China reform and opening up. Yu Hua novel by harmony of modern and contemporary history of China going to suggest Inc. family as Mississauga is finally build own unique narrative. Yu Hua popular in the publishing market in South Korea can be found in the grounds of universality, surpassing a Chinese specialty. 『活着』, 『許三觀賣血記』 the family of the Passion through the struggle for the fulfillment of destiny and lack of survival saga finally anneunda calmly pulled the sufferings of the Chinese history. 『兄弟』 and 『第七日』 was represented a departure from the mundane and the transcendent from the earth. These works express the consciousness of the contemporary history of discord openly. Yu Hua is expressed in the form of Chinese modern history, family history of suffering. History was thus that the two approaches are two aspects of engagement and discord.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue중국현대문학Same topicAsian Culture and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207