MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1498305920

Abstract 11749: Cell-Specific Expression of Voltage-Sensitive Protein Confirms Cardiac Myocyte to Non-Myocyte Electrotonic Coupling in Healed Murine Infarct Border Tissue

2014· article· en· W1498305920 on OpenAlexaff
T. Alexander Quinn, Patrizia Camelliti, Urszula Siedlecka, Tommaso Poggioli, Leslie M. Loew, Thomas Knöpfel, Peter Köhl

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyocyteCell biologyCardiac myocyteYellow fluorescent proteinMedicineMolecular biologyBiologyBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Heterocellular electrotonic coupling of cardiac myocytes and non-myocytes is common in vitro , yet its presence, extent and role in vivo are debated. Optogenetic tools provide a unique means for cell-specific assessment of electrophysiology. Here, we utilise the genetically-encoded voltage-sensitive fluorescent protein 2.3 (VSFP2.3) to monitor transmembrane potential (Vm) in myocytes or fibroblasts of isolated murine hearts. Methods: Transgenic mice expressing VSFP2.3 under the control of either alpha-myosin heavy chain promoter (αMHC; myocytes) or Wilm’s tumor promoter (WT1; fibroblasts) were generated by Cre-LoxP recombination. Infarcts (left ventricular freewall) were caused by cryoablation, followed by 8 weeks recovery. Vm was measured in mechanically-uncoupled (10μM blebbistatin) Langendorff-perfused hearts by simultaneous collection of VSFP2.3 donor (mCerulean; CFP) and acceptor (citrine; YFP), or of VSFP2.3 YFP and voltage-sensitive dye (di-4-ANBDQPQ) signals, using an EMCCD camera (128х128 pixels, 511Hz) on an upright microscope (10х water-immersion lens). Cell-specificity of transgene expression was confirmed post hoc by immunohistochemistry (myomesin for myocytes, vimentin for fibroblasts) using confocal microscopy. Results: Cardiomyocyte action potentials (AP) were successfully measured in αMHC-VSFP2.3 mice by CFP/YFP ratiometry. After adding di-4-ANBDQPQ to these hearts, signal comparison reconfirmed slower AP upstroke and repolarisation kinetics of VSFP2.3 (Fig.A). Strikingly, myocyte-like AP were also recorded, in (dye-free) WT1-VSFP2.3 hearts, from fibroblasts at the infarct border zone (Fig.B). Conclusions: Results demonstrate the utility of VSFP2.3 for cell-specific cardiac electrophysiology research. In addition, observation of AP-like potentials in non-excitable cells confirms in vivo electrotonic coupling of cardiac myocytes and non-myocytes in healed murine infarct border tissue. ![][1] [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207