Differential Expression of Inducible Costimulator-Ligand Splice Variants: Lymphoid Regulation of Mouse GL50-B and Human GL50 Molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The process of immunological costimulation between APC and T cells is mediated by protein ligand:receptor interactions. To date, costimulatory receptors known to be expressed by T cells include the structurally related proteins CD28 and the inducible costimulator (ICOS). The ligands to human and mouse ICOS, human GL50 (hGL50), and mouse GL50 (mGL50) were recently cloned and demonstrated to have sequence similarity to the CD28 ligands B7-1 and B7-2. Examination of mGL50 cDNA transcripts by 3'RACE revealed an alternatively spliced form, mGL50-B, that encoded a protein product with a divergent 27-aa intracellular domain. Both mGL50- and mGL50-B-transfected cells exhibited binding to human and mouse ICOS-Ig fusion protein, indicating that the alternate cytoplasmic domain of mGL50-B does not interfere with extracellular interactions with ICOS receptor. Flow cytometric and RT-PCR analysis of BALB/c and RAG1(-/-) mice splenocytes demonstrate that freshly isolated B cells, T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells express both splice variant forms of ICOS ligand. Comparative analyses with the human ICOS ligand splice variants hGL50 and B7-H2 indicate that differential splicing at the junction of cytoplasmic exon 6 and exon 7 may be a common method by which GL50-ICOS immunological costimulatory processes are regulated in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".