MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1498864459 · doi:10.1093/fs/knt237

Mindscapes of Montréal: Québec's Urban Novel, 1960–2005 <i>Mindscapes of Montréal: Québec's Urban Novel, 1960–2005</i> . By C <scp>eri</scp> M <scp>organ</scp> . (French and Francophone Studies). Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2012. xiv + 221 pp.

2014· article· en· W1498864459 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachel Killick

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrenchHistoryArt historyPerformance artMedia studiesLibrary scienceArtCartographyHumanitiesGeographySociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ceri Morgan's fascinating narrative successfully achieves the difficult feat of linking concise historical, political, and socio-economic information on Quebec and its major city Montreal with sustained reflection on concomitant changes in the city's cultural environment and their reflection and refraction in contemporaneous fictional production. Her six chapters follow a flexible and roughly chronological pattern traversing decade by decade a variety of key locations and neighbourhoods: the ‘Manichean’ bilingual city (West End anglophone, East End francophone) of the Quiet Revolution and the nationalist 1960s; the francophone working-class suburbs of Longueil and Rivière des Prairies, birthplaces of the October Crisis of 1970; the depoliticized, individualistic climate of downtown, in the wake of the 1980 referendum defeat and the ‘spectacular’ affirmation of diverse sexual identities manifest in the red-light district of Saint Catherine Street East; the pluricultural turn of the 1980s and the surge of immigrant writing around Côte des Neiges and Mile End; the disaffected, bof, post-baby-boomer generation of the globalized ‘world city’ of the 1990s; and, finally, the fragmented microspaces of the urban loner, apartment, café, or park (early 2000s). Each chapter comprises a résumé of salient political and socio-economic events, a thumbnail of contemporary fictional writing, and more detailed summary and analysis of three representative novels. The eighteen authors and works provide an interesting mix of the familiar and the less well known. Thus Jacques Ferron, Michel Tremblay, and Francine Noël stand alongside Josée Yvon, Christian Mistral, and Danielle Roger; and Nicole Brossard's French Kiss and Dany Laferrière's Comment faire l'amour avec un nègre sans se fatiguer alongside André Major's Le Cabochon and Louis Hamelin's La Rage. Although there have been other studies of Quebec's modern novel, Morgan's book is unique as an up-to-date description and analysis in English of this major genre. Her chosen approach as a cultural and literary geographer works well, both for an anglophone readership, whose acquaintance with the province and with Montreal-based fiction may be patchy or non-existent, and for a more knowledgeable audience, who will enjoy revisiting the familiar and discovering the unfamiliar through the lens of the author's original mix of critical insight and imaginative empathy (the book is enhanced by short snatches of Morgan's own creative writing). Indeed, both groups would probably have appreciated an even fuller examination of the different mindscapes so engagingly highlighted in her panoramic survey. One disappointment, determined no doubt by publishing constraints, is the shortness of the main text (only 140 pages) — the tip of a very substantial iceberg of research, attested by nearly fifty pages of footnotes and some thirty pages of bibliography. Another is the absence of any complementary visual illustration (beyond the attractive cover photograph and a skimpy map (p. xiv) of central and greater Montreal). The final straw is the extortionate price (currently £90), a deterrent to potential purchasers and readers for whom the book would be a most informative and thought-provoking guide on their flâneries through the cultural and literary heart of French North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0790.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207