Biofilm form and function: carbon availability affects biofilm architecture, metabolic activity and planktonic cell yield
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate carbon transformation by biofilms and changes in biofilm architecture, metabolic activity and planktonic cell yield in response to fluctuating carbon availability. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pseudomonas sp. biofilms were cultured under alternating carbon-replete and carbon-limited conditions. A shift to medium without added carbon led to a 90% decrease in biofilm respiration rate and a 40% reduction in planktonic cell yield within 1 h. Attached cell division and progeny release were shown to contribute to planktonic cell numbers during carbon limitation. Development of a significantly enlarged biofilm surface area during carbon limitation facilitated a rapid increase in whole-biofilm metabolic activity, cell yield and biomass upon the re-introduction of carbon after 8 days of limitation. The cumulative number of planktonic cells (>10(10) CFU) released from the biofilm during the cultivation period contained only 1·0% of the total carbon available to the biofilm, with 6·5% of the carbon retained in the biofilm and 54% mineralized to CO(2) . CONCLUSIONS: Biofilm-derived planktonic cell yield is a proliferation mechanism. The rapid response of biofilms to environmental perturbations facilitates the optimal utilization of resources to promote both proliferation and survival. Biofilms function as efficient catalysts for environmental carbon transformation and mineralization. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: A greater understanding of the relationship between biofilm form and function can inform strategies intended to control and/or promote biofilm formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".