High Throughput Screeening of Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Cyclolinopeptides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) seed is a rich source of potentially valuable cyclic peptides (CLs). The current research investigated the genotypic and environmental variation of CLs expressed in the Flax World Core Collection by means of high-throughput extraction and rapid HPLC analysis. The collection is a representative subsample of the widest diversity of flax gene resources. The performance of monolithic and microparticulate HPLC columns were compared for their efficiency in rapid reversed phase liquid chromatographic separation of CLs. CL analysis time was reduced to 1.5 min at a flow rate of 3.0 mL•min-1 using a monolithic Chromolith® SpeedROD. The column performed over 2000 injections without measurable changes in performance under these conditions. The optimum extraction conditions of CLs were also established. Total CL content was proportional to sum of UV absorbance (mAU) of the observed peptide chromatographic peaks at 214 nm. The total mAU of samples extracts from core collection samples planted in Saskatoon ranged from 71.4 to 223.7 mAU with a mean value of 153.5 ± 24.3 mAU ( + SD), whereas the total mAU from samples grown at the Morden site ranged from 96.2 to 243.6 mAU with a mean value of 171.3 ± 24.0 mAU. The highest total CL content was observed in cultivar ‘AC Watson’, whereas, ‘Primus’ and an unnamed accession (CN 101580, TMP 10121) exhibited the highest ratio CLs expressed by NCBI gene sequence AFSQ01016651.1 to peptides expressed by gene sequence AFSQ01025165.1. In contrast, the lowest total CL content and ratio of these gene products was observed in ‘Hollandia’ and ‘Z 11637’. No correlation between CL content and plant height, stem branching, petal colour, seed colour, seed weight, seed oil content, or α-linolenic content was evident. In addition to the known peptides, novel peptides 1-Met-CLN, 1-Mso-CLN, and 1-Msn-CLN were identified from ‘Hollandia’ and ‘Z 11637’. The variation of CL content and composition of flaxseed from the core collection reveals that genetics may benefit flax breeding programs by allowing the selection of flax accessions with improved composition and functional properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".