Bibliographic record
Abstract
Étrange discours que celui de la pédagogie, engagé dans le rapport à l’État, mais revendiquant son autonomie, travaillé par l’enjeu sociétal, rejouant sans cesse l’anamnèse de ses fondements et l’utopie de son projet. Le colossal édifice de messages et de discours accumulé dans ce siècle autour de l’éducation s’écroulera-t-il sous le poids – ingérable, insignifiant – ou constituera-t-il une mine de données que quelque auteur collectif saura, malgré les réducteurs du sens ou les prophètes du futur, exploiter pour une anthropologie critique enfin en marche, moins dépendante des enjeux du système qui les génère ? C’est là une interrogation de l’utopie réaliste comme des travaux qui militent en ce sens. C’est pourquoi une philosophie en éducation ne peut se contenter de prendre acte, mais est conviée à faire acte, à participer au questionnement permanent dont chaque discipline s’honore.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.067 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".