Bibliographic record
Abstract
The identification and isolation of circadian pacemaker cells is of critical importance to studies of circadian clocks at all phylogenetic levels. In the vertebrate classes, a few structures of diencephalic origin have been implicated as potential sites but for only two, the avian pineal and the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), has a pacemaker role in addition to oscillatory behaviour been demonstrated by the transfer of pacemaker properties from one organism to another. Studies of the mammalian system in particular have benefited from the ability to restore circadian function using transplantation of tissue from the SCN and from the availability of a hamster period mutant, tau, that allows donor-derived and host-derived rhythms to be distinguished easily. Initial cross-genotype transplantation studies and the subsequent creation of circadian chimeras expressing two phenotypes simultaneously demonstrated the pacemaker capability of the SCN, and demonstrated the relative autonomy of this nucleus as a pacemaking structure. Despite an abundance of information regarding the anatomy, physiology and pharmacology of these nuclei, the identity of the pacemaker cells and their methods of communication with each other and the organism remain obscure. None the less, it is possible under certain conditions to create chimeras with two clocks that interact. The behaviour of these animals provides a unique opportunity to study the nature and timing of pacemaker communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".