MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1500035247

Reinventing the Feature Story: Mythic Cycles in American Literary Journalism

2005· article· en· W1500035247 on OpenAlex
Berkley Hudson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJournalismPoliticsContext (archaeology)SociologyMedia studiesMass mediaCommunication studiesEmpirePolitical historyHistoryLawSocial sciencePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Start, Paul. The Creation of the Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications. New York: Basic Books, 2004. 484 pp. $27.50 Research in mass communication, especially studies focused on journalism history, typically concentrate on an individual event, sometimes a series of events, and occasionally a window of a decade or more. And, just as typically, media historians take as subjects the works, lives, and innovations of individual journalists, advertising agents, or public relations professionals; the rises, falls, and impacts of particular media institutions or journalistic trends; the coverage of a particular war, political event, politician, or social movement; or the influence of individual and institutional efforts to influence journalists' work. Periodically Willard Bleyer, Alfred Lee, Frank Luther Mott, Edwin Emery, or one of their successors cherry pick these focused historical studies and the trade journals for chronicles of American journalism history-textbooks of partial, selective, and disconnected constructions of history that never quite satisfy teachers and students in media history courses. On occasion, however, a scholaroften separated from the lore of journalism and mass communication practice, study, or history-examines afresh communication history to synthesize trends in journalism in the context of broad social, economic, political, and philosophical patterns. Harold Innis offers an example; this Canadian economist, with a broad brush, established in Empire and Communications and The Bias of Communication two central tendencies of mass communication as corrosive to local communities and cultures and fundamental to nations, imperialism, and modern commercial concentration. The Creation of the Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications by Princeton Sociology professor Paul Starr, similar to the work of Innis, offers teachers and students another important synthesizing study of mass communication. Although Starr concentrates on the evolution of U.S. communication, he does so while continuously comparing development of U.S. media systems under democratic liberalism to those systems that evolved in nations and empires adhering to more feudal and authoritarian notions. Essentially Starr argues the characteristics of today's mass communication systems derive from political philosophy in place in nations and empires when modern communication technologies first emerged at the end of the eighteenth century. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it