MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1500229388 · doi:10.1108/14777260910960911

Determinants of out‐of‐pocket expenditures on prescribed medications in Tajikistan

2009· article· en· W1500229388 on OpenAlexaff
Nazim Habibov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Health Organization and Management · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Systems and Reforms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPovertyWaiverHealth careOriginalityMedicinePopulationPerspective (graphical)Public economicsBusinessValue (mathematics)Actuarial scienceEconomic growthEnvironmental healthEconomicsPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to quantify the impact of socio-economic characteristics on out-of pocket expenditures for prescribed medications in Tajikistan and provide recommendations for healthcare sector reform. The research question in this paper is: what household, personal, economic, and health factors help explain expenditures on medications? From a theoretical perspective, this paper contributes to the on-going discussion of out-of-pocket expenditures in Tajikistan. From a practical perspective, in line with this recent development in the Tajikistan healthcare sector, it helps to develop evidence-based decision-making by answering practical questions: what factors affect pattern of out-of-pocket expenditures for prescribed medication? Which groups of the population should be granted a discount or fee-waiver when buying them? DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Based on micro-file data from the most recent cross-sectional nationally-representative survey of Tajik households, this paper develops and tests a multivariate model of identifying determinants of out-of-pocket expenditures on prescribed medications in Tajikistan. FINDINGS: The paper finds that economic status, chronic illness, disability, number of small children, short supply of necessary drugs, and cardiac and acute illnesses are the strongest determinants of spending for prescribed medications in the country. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This paper demonstrates that to ensure accessibility to and affordability of prescribed medications, discounts or fee-waivers should be granted to specific categories of households, those in poverty, with chronically ill members and with small children. These discounts or fee-waivers should cover prescribed medications for children, long-standing illness as well as for cardiac and acute infectious diseases. Administrative and economic measures should be taken to reduce the extra costs incurred due to the shortage of prescribed medications. Hence, these findings can be used in developing and designing reforms in the Tajikistan healthcare sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Health Organization and ManagementSame topicHealthcare Systems and ReformsFrench-language works237,207