MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1500282391 · doi:10.22134/trace.57.2010.382

Representaciones y conductas. Un repertorio de las violencias entre los nahuas de la Sierra Norte de Puebla

2018· article· es· W1500282391 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Trace · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Cultures and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesHappinessPhilosophyPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entre los nahuas, no hay un equivalente estricto a “violencia”. Sin embargo, la idea de una fuerza excesiva y peligrosa impregna, por una parte, un amplio conjunto de representaciones míticas (violencia fundadora) y ethohistóricas (agresiones y resistencia). También está muy presente en lo cotidiano, en formas múltiples: robos, envidia, brujería y violencia doméstica. A pesar de lo amplio del fenómeno, cuyo corolario es un “discurso de la desgracia”, no se puede hablar aquí de una cultura de la violencia, puesto que nuestros interlocutores dedican mucho esfuerzo a sobrepasarla para construir una felicidad personal y familiar, aunque la sientan muy frágil.Abstract:Among the Nahua, one does not find a strict equivalent to “violence”. Yet, on the one hand, the idea of an excessive, dangerous force permeates a large set of narratives, mythical (founding violence) and ethnohistorical (aggressions and resistance). On the other hand, violence is quite present in daily life, under multiple forms: thefts, “envy” and witchcraft, domestic violence. In spite of this extension, whose corollary is a “discourse of disgrace”, one cannot speak here of a culture of violence, since our interlocutors devote much energy to overcome it in order to build a personal and familial happiness, however frail they may feel it is.Résumé : Chez les Nahuas, il n’y a pas d’équivalent strict à “violence”. Cependant, l’idée d’une force excessive et dangereuse imprègne, d’une part, un vaste ensemble de représentations mythiques (violence fondatrice) et ethnohistoriques (agressions et résistance). Elle est aussi très présente au quotidien, sous de multiples formes : vols, “envie” et sorcellerie, violence domestique. Malgré l’ampleur du phénomène, dont le corollaire est un “discours du malheur”, on ne peut parler ici de culture de la violence, puisque nos interlocuteurs s’attachent à la surmonter pour construire un bonheur personnel et familial, qu’ils sentent cependant fragile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it