Diagnostic ophthalmology ophtalmologie diagnostique.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
History and clinical signs A n 8-year-old, 5-kg, neutered male domestic shorthair cat was examined at the ophthalmology service at the Western College of Veterinary Medicine for evaluation of a pink mass on the left eye. General physical examination was normal except for the ocular abnormalities. The menace responses were present bilaterally. Direct and consensual pupillary light reflexes were present in both eyes. The palpebral, and oculocephalic reflexes were present bilaterally. Schirmer tear test (Schirmer Tear Test Strips; Alcon Canada, Mississauga, Ontario) values were 10 mm/ min bilaterally. The intraocular pressures were estimated with a rebound tonometer (Tonvet; Tiolat, Helsinki, Finland) and were 16 mmHg bilaterally. Results from fluorescein staining (Fluorets; Bausch & Lomb Canada, Markham, Ontario) were negative bilaterally. On direct examination the palpebral conjunctiva and third eyelids were hyperaemic and thickened bilaterally and a pink fleshy mass was present in the left lateral cornea extending from the limbus centrally. Biomicroscopic (Osram 64222; Carl Zeiss Canada, Don Mills, Ontario) examination following dilation with 0.5% tropicamide (Mydriacyl; Alcon, Canada, Mississauga, Ontario) revealed further abnormalities including bilaterally peripheral corneal vascularization and a white-pink infiltrate in the superficial corneal stroma adjacent to the fleshy mass. Indirect ophthalmoscopic (Heine Omega 200; Heine Instruments Canada, Kitchener, Ontario) examination was unremarkable. A photograph of both eyes is provided for your assessment (Figure 1).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".