Modeling the soil consumption of atmospheric methane at the global scale
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simple scheme for the soil consumption of atmospheric methane, based on an exact solution of the one‐dimensional diffusion‐reaction equation in the near‐surface soil layer, is described. The model includes a parameterization of biological oxidation that is sensitive to soil temperature, moisture content, and land cultivation fraction. The scheme was incorporated in the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS), with forcing provided by a 21‐a, global land meteorological data set, and was calibrated using multiyear field measurements. Application of the scheme on the global scale gives an annual mean sink strength of 28 Tg CH 4 a −1 , with an estimated uncertainty range of 9–47 Tg CH 4 a −1 . A strong seasonality is present at Northern Hemisphere high latitudes, with enhanced uptake during the summer months. Under the specified surface forcings, the oxidation parameterization is more sensitive to soil moisture than to temperature. Compared to the previous work of Ridgwell et al. (1999), our empirically based water stress parameterization reduces uptake more rapidly with decreasing soil moisture, resulting in a decrease of ∼50% in the potential global sink strength. Analysis of the geographical distribution of methane consumption shows that subtropical and dry tropical ecosystems account for over half of the global uptake.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it