Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of human pregnancy on metabolic and respiratory responses to maximal cycle ergometer testing and to test the hypothesis that the respiratory exchange ratio at maximal exercise and peak postexercise lactate concentration are lower in the pregnant compared with the nonpregnant state and that these effects are associated with lower excess postexercise oxygen consumption during pregnancy. METHODS: The pregnant (n = 14, mean gestational age 34.7 +/- 0.4 weeks) and nonpregnant control group (n = 14) included healthy, physically active women. Groups were matched for age, height, parity, prepregnant body mass and body mass index (BMI), and aerobic fitness. Breath-by-breath gas exchange was measured at rest, during exercise, and 15 minutes after exercise. The minimum sample size to detect a statistically significant result for a reasonable difference (0.25 L/min) in the ventilatory threshold was calculated to be ten subjects per group; thus, 14 was considered adequate. RESULTS: Maximal oxygen uptake, the ventilatory threshold, the point of respiratory compensation, and calculated work efficiency did not differ significantly between groups. However, the respiratory exchange ratio at maximal exercise, peak postexercise lactate, and excess postexercise oxygen consumption were significantly lower in the pregnant group. Peak lactate was significantly correlated with the respiratory exchange ratio and excess postexercise oxygen consumption. CONCLUSION: The capacity for weight-supported work is preserved in late gestation, and work efficiency is unchanged. However, carbohydrate utilization might be blunted at high levels of exertion. Blunted respiratory responses were attributed to reduced lactate production and/or dilution of lactate in an expanded blood volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".