MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W150103661 · doi:10.1055/s-0031-1299958

Clinical Effects of Nifuratel in Vulvovaginal Infections

2011· review· en· W150103661 on OpenAlexaff
Werner Mendling, A. Poli, Paola Magnani

Bibliographic record

VenueArzneimittelforschung · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVulvovaginal CandidiasisDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nifuratel (CAS 4936-47-4) displays a strong antiprotozoarian and antibacterial activity and is provided with certain fungicidal effect, but it is not active against the physiologic flora. Its therapeutic effectiveness has been evaluated in more than 12,000 patients. The wide clinical experience with nifuratel confirms that the drug is safe and effective for the treatment of trichomoniasis, bacterial vaginosis, candidosis, and, particularly, in patients suffering from mixed vaginal infection. A meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing nifuratel and metronidazole (CAS 443-48-1) in vulvovaginal infections was performed. All parallel-group metronidazole-controlled trials carried out in patients with vulvovaginal infections have been included, complying with the following criteria: 1) cure assessed both as disappearance of symptoms and signs, and negative microbiological findings; 2) microbiological tests performed with valid methods still used in current practice. Seven clinical trials have been selected, including overall 1767 patients, 832 out of whom were treated with nifuratel and 935 with metronidazole. The results of the meta-analysis confirmed the equivalence between nifuratel and metronidazole: overall proportion of cured patients in the two groups were 88.5% and 90.0%, respectively, in the presence of homogeneity among studies (p = 0.342). In the fixed and random effect analyses, the confidence interval of Odds ratio included 1 and the p values for testing the hypothesis of no difference between treatments were 0.656-1.266, p = 0.582 (fixed effects) and 0.643-1.290, p = 0.599 (random effects), respectively, indicating equivalence. Furthermore, some controlled studies and the wide clinical experience showed that the cure rate of nifuratel in patients with mixed infections due to Trichomonas vaginalis + Candida or Trichomonas vaginalis + bacteria or with bacterial vaginosis and mixed bacterial flora is higher than that of metronidazole, due to the wide spectrum of action of nifuratel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.015
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArzneimittelforschungSame topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207