MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1501719524 · doi:10.1111/cid.12196

Variability in Particle Degradation of Four Commonly Employed Dental Bone Grafts

2014· article· en· W1501719524 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shuang Yang, Lan Liao, Richard J. Miron, Lingfei Wei, Meng Zhang, Yufeng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersProgram for New Century Excellent Talents in UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRANKLBone resorptionDentistryResorptionAcid phosphataseDegradation (telecommunications)ChemistryH&E stainStainingMaterials scienceMedicineInternal medicineBiochemistryReceptorPathologyActivator (genetics)Enzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Replacement bone grafting materials are used clinically for a variety of clinical procedures to augment and replace lost or missing bone. Little information is available regarding their degradation properties. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the degradation rate and modes of degradation of four commonly used bone grafting materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A natural bone mineral (NBM) of bovine origin, NBM in combination with enamel matrix derivative (EMD), LifeNet demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA), and Osteotech DFDBA were analyzed for particle degradation over time in 3 mm femur defects created in female Wistar rats. At 2, 4, and 8 weeks postimplantation, femur defects were assigned to histological analysis. Hematoxylin and eosin, Safranin O, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) staining were performed to determine the rate of particle degradation, number of osteoclasts around particles, and intensity and localization of TRAP, RANKL, and MMP-2 staining. RESULTS: In the present study, NBM particles demonstrated little signs of degradation. The combination of NBM with EMD significantly increased the number of osteoclasts around NBM particles and increased expression of RANKL and MMP-2 specifically around particle surface. Only minor resorption was observed. Both DFDBA particles showed much faster degradation of particles. Interestingly, fewer osteoclasts were found on their surface when compared with NBM particles, specifically on Osteotech DFDBA particles, suggesting an alternative mode of degradation. Osteotech DFDBA particles demonstrated significantly faster degradation when compared with all other bone grafts. No obvious increase in TRAP, RANKL, or MMP2 was observed to validate this fast rate of degradation. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the present study demonstrate a wide range of particle degradation between various commonly commercially available bone grafts. Further research to determine the precise mechanisms that influence particle degradation is necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207