MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502208677

Medir la producción científica de los investigadores universitarios: la bibliometría y sus límites

2007· article· es· W1502208677 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de la Educación Superior · 2007
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology Research and Bibliometrics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBibliometricsWork (physics)ProductivityInternationalizationProcess (computing)Library sciencePolitical scienceSociologyComputer scienceBusinessEconomicsEngineeringEconomic growth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The measurement of the scientific work is inscribed into a process of four basic components: the entrance of resources, its transformation, its exit and the impact of its outcomes. Official statistics takes care of measurement of the entrances to the process of scientific and technological production, whereas biblio metrics is in charge of measuring the scientific outcomes and thus is directly related to the productivity of the university researchers. In the new dynamic of internationalization of the scientific work both methods are in debate; in addition bibliometrics goes through the discussion of t its origins, methods and technical limits. The objective of this article is to present the most significant elements about this debate and the traits that, nowadays, define bibliometrics in a worldwide level and in the Mexican case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0410.067
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it