Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reviews the impacts of urban planning regulations on urban form changes based on a case study of the Donwhamunro area, an old quarter in the city center Seoul, Korea. Examining the Zoning and the District Unit Planning(DUP) regulations, applied to the Donwhamunro area from 1962 to 2002, this paper identifies the site's five zones of different characteristics and the change periods of regulations. Within each zone, the paper delineates its urban form changes by measuring the degrees of transformation in streets, lots, buildings and building uses, and by checking the development frequencies in the change periods of regulations. According to what the paper finds, the following three points could be interpreted; 1) Both the Zoning and DUP regulations themselves largely contributed more to the deterioration of the Donwhamunro area rather to the development of the area; 2) Urban planning regulations tended to serve their intended goals of the area's planned maintenance, only when the development conditions, such as public improvements of the roads, were provided by the public sector; 3) As the current Zoning and DUP regulations were mostly intended for development-focused management of the area, they lacked proper considerations for the conservation of the area's old urban form characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".