MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Matrix metalloproteinase‐2 mediate oncostatin‐M induced cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation (1151.2)

2014· article· en· W1502280630 on OpenAlexaffabout
Frank Fan, Mohammad Ali, Bryan Hughes, Katherine Launier, Richard Schulz

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcomereCell biologyMatrix metalloproteinaseMyofibrilMyocyteExtracellular matrixChemistryBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dedifferentiated cardiomyocytes are an important source of cardiac progenitor cells facilitating cardiac repair. Cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation induced by oncostatin‐M (OSM) is characterized by progressive sarcomere degeneration. However, the mechanism regarding the execution of sarcomere degeneration remains unclear. Matrix metalloproteinase‐2 (MMP‐2) is a key intracellular protease abundantly expressed in cardiomyocytes. We hypothesized that MMP‐2 may be involved in cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation. We performed confocal immunofluorescence and biochemical studies to explore the role of MMP‐2 in OSM‐induced dedifferentiation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVM). Cells treated with OSM (10‐200 ng/ml for 1‐5 days) showed a dose and time‐dependent loss of sarcomeric α‐actinin and troponin‐I. The mature sarcomere transformed to a pattern resembling a less developed sarcomere (Z‐disks transformed into Z‐bodies usually found in immature myofibrils). Western blots and gelatin zymography showed that OSM treatment dose‐dependently increased MMP‐2 activity. Both selective MMP‐2 inhibitor (ARP100, 100 µM) and pan‐MMP inhibitors (GM6001, 5 µM) rescued OSM‐induced sarcomere degeneration. These results suggest that intracellular MMP‐2 mediates sarcomere degeneration in OSM‐induced cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and potentially contributes to cardiomyocyte regeneration. Grant Funding Source : The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingFrench-language works237,207