MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502398371

CURRENT EXPERIMENTS IN ELEMENTARY PARTICLE PHYSICS - March 1983

2010· article· en· W1502398371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Frosch

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational laboratoryDESYElementary particle physicsNuclear physicsPhysicsLibrary scienceEngineering physicsParticle physicsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1>r.lii^ fy&> (7) LBL~91-Rev{2) DE83 011259 LBL-91 Revised UC-34C March 1983 CURRENT EXPERIMENTS IN ELEMENTARY-PARTICLE PHYSICS C.G. WoU, F.E. Anastroag, A. Rittenberg, T.G. Trippe, G.P. Yost Particle Data Group. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. Berkeley. CA 94720 USA L A**s Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Stanford. CA 94305 USA P. Joos DESY. Notkestrasse 85. D-2000 Hamburg-52. Germany Y. Oyanagi University of Tsukuba, Sakura-mura, Niihari-gun, Ibaraki-ken 305, Japan D . C Dodder Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545. USA S.N. Gndtsia, YM.G. Ryabov Institute for High Energy Physics. Serpukhov, Protvino, Moscow Region, USSR R. Frosch SIN, Swiss Institute for Nuclear Research, CH-5234 Villigen. Switzerland A.OIiii TRIUMF, 4004 Wesbrook Mall. Vancouver BC V6T 2A3. Canada LAWRENCE BERKELEY LABORATORY University of California Prepared for the US. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC03-76SF00098 MAS1ER BISiRIBUTICa CF THIS CSCiffiBT IS U*i(.IMlTE0

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2360.131

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207