¿Y después de la neoliberalización? Estrategias metodológicas para la investigación de las transformaciones regulatorias contemporáneas / After Neoliberalization? Methodological Strategies for the Investigation of Contemporary Regulatory Transformations.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen El presente ensayo ofrece un marco teorico para el analisis de los procesos de reestructuracion regulatoria del capitalismo contemporaneo, tomando como trasfondo los debates sobre los origenes y consecuencias de la crisis economica global de 2008-2009. El analisis se articula en torno al concepto de neoliberalizacion, que consideramos esencial para comprender las transformaciones regulatorias de nuestra epoca. Comenzamos con una serie de definiciones aclaratorias que refuerzan nuestra conceptualizacion de la neoliberalizacion como un proceso abigarrado, geograficamente desigual y dependiente de una trayectoria previa (path-dependent). Sobre esta base, distinguimos tres dimensiones en los procesos de neoliberalizacion: la experimentacion regulatoria, la transferencia de politicas interjurisdiccionales y la formacion de regimenes normativos transnacionales. Tales distinciones conforman la base de una periodizacion esquematica que explica como los procesos de neoliberalizacion se han consolidado en varios niveles espaciales y extendido por toda la economia mundial desde la decada de los ochenta. Asimismo, proporcionan una perspectiva analitica desde la que explorar diversos escenarios para las formas de reestructuracion regulatoria contra-neoliberalizadoras. Pese a que nuestro analisis no aborda directamente los efectos que dichas transformaciones regulatorias tienen sobre paisajes urbanos particulares, el ensayo concluye subrayando alguna de las implicaciones que aquellas pueden tener para los actuales esfuerzos por descifrar estos ultimos. Palabras clave: Neoliberalizacion, contra-neoliberalizacion, experimentos regulatorios, transferencia de politicas, regimenes normativos. Abstract Against the background of debates on the origins and implications of the global economic crisis of 2008-2009, this essay presents a theoretical framework for analyzing processes of regulatory restructuring under contemporary capitalism. The analysis is framed around the concept of neoliberalization, which we view as a keyword for understanding the regulatory transformations of our time. We begin with a series of definitional clarifications that underpin our conceptualization of neoliberalization as a variegated, geographically uneven and path dependent process. On this basis, we distinguish three dimensions of neoliberalization processes—regulatory experimentation; inter-jurisdictional policy transfer; and the formation of transnational rule-regimes. Such distinctions form the basis for a schematic periodization of how neoliberalization processes have been entrenched at various spatial scales and extended across the world economy since the 1980s. They also generate an analytical perspective from which to explore several scenarios for counter-neoliberalizing forms of regulatory restructuring. While our analysis does not directly consider the effects of these regulatory transformations on particular urban landscapes, we conclude by outlining some of its implications for ongoing efforts to decipher the latter. Keywords: Neoliberalization, counter-neoliberalization, regulatory experiments, policy transfer, rule regimes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it