MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1502492997 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab71

71 EFFECT OF CALCIUM IONOPHORE AND CYTOCHALASIN D ON ACTIVATION AND IN VITRO DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR TRANSFER BOVINE EMBRYOS

2004· article· en· W1502492997 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Jacek Rzucidlo, Sezen Arat, Steven L. Stice

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsCytochalasin BBlastocystOocyte activationIonophoreAndrologySomatic cell nuclear transferFetal bovine serumEmbryo cultureOocyteMolecular biologyCalciumSodium pyruvateBiologyChemistryIn vitroEmbryoInternal medicineBiochemistryCryopreservationCell biologyEmbryogenesisMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The activation of oocytes is one of the most important steps for a successful cloning, and chemicals used for activation can affect the viability of cloned offspring. Therefore, some of them may be omitted for activation to eliminate their possible detrimental effect on nuclear transfer (NT) embryos. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of calcium ionophore (CaI, A23187, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and cytochalasin D (CD) on activation and in vitro development of nuclear transfer units derived from bovine granulosa cells (GCs) treated with the cell cycle inhibitor, roscovitine. Bovine oocytes isolated from slaughterhouse ovaries were matured in TCM199 supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS), sodium pyruvate, penicillin/streptomycin, rIGF-1, bFSH, and bLH. GCs were isolated from ovarian follicles and cultured in DMEM-F12 supplemented with 10% FBS at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air. Prior to NT, donor cells were exposed to 15 mM roscovitine for 24 hours and small cells were used for NT. A single cell was inserted into the perivitelline space of the enucleated oocyte. Oocyte-cell couples were fused using a 20 µs DC pulse of 40V/150 µm. Two hours after fusion, NT units were assigned into four groups and activated by CaI (5 µM for 10 min.), and then incubated with cycloheximide (CHX, 10 µg mL-1) + CD (2.5 µg mL-1) for 1 h, followed by CHX alone (without CD) for 5 h (Group I) or CaI (for 10 min.), followed by CHX alone for 6 h (Group II). In the Group III, NT units were activated by CHX (10 µg mL-1) + CD (2.5 µg mL-1) for 1 h, followed by CHX for 5 h, and Group IV, CHX alone for 6 h. The base activation medium was TCM199 with 1% FBS for CaI and 10% FBS for CHX and CD. After activation, NT units were cultured for 7 days in BARC medium. Differences in activation, cleavage and blastocyst formation rates among treatments were analyzed by one-way ANOVA after arcsin square transformation. The results are summarized in Table 1. Our data showed that CaI and CD did not affect the activation and in vitro development of NT embryos derived from roscovitine-treated GCs. It suggests that both chemicals may be redundant during cloning procedure. This study was supported by a grant from ProLinia, Inc and TUBITAK, Turkey (VHAG-1908-102V048). Table 1 In vitro development of NT embryos in different activation treatments

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207