MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W150312364 · doi:10.31274/rtd-180813-12730

Analysis of genomic region(s) and gene(s) associated with cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog

2006· dissertation· en· W150312364 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vicki L. Wilke

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCruciate ligamentLamenessSurgeryAnterior cruciate ligament

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament (CCLR) in the dog is the most common cause of hind limb lameness. When CCLR occurs it results in instability in the knee leading to progressive, debilitating arthritis and lameness. Particular breeds of dogs (e.g. Newfoundland) are predisposed to CCLR while other breeds (e.g. Greyhound) have dramatically reduced frequency of this disorder supporting a heritable basis for the CCLR trait. For this study, we first estimated the economic impact to veterinary clients for the medical and surgical management for CCLR at 1.3 billion in the U.S. in 2003. Next, we examined medical records for a diagnosis of CCLR for all Newfoundlands that were presented to the Iowa State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital. One hundred sixty three Newfoundlands were evaluated from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2002, and 22% were diagnosed with CCLR. In addition, a large-scale recruitment study was undertaken from the National Newfoundland Registry and local breeders and included 411 Newfoundlands, of which 92 (22%; 53 females and 39 males) were affected with CCLR and 319 (182 females and 137 males) were unaffected. The average inbreeding coefficient for those animals that were inbred was 0.05 (range 0.004--0.17), heritability was 0.27, and the segregation analysis predicted a recessive pattern of inheritance. The frequency of the recessive allele was 0.60 with 51% penetrance. Biological candidate gene analysis yielded single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in COL9A1, COL9A2, COMP, and FBN. Association analyses using restriction fragment length polymorphisms designed from the SNPs were performed on 90 dogs selected from a population of Newfoundlands; 45 unaffected and 45 affected with CCLR. There was no statistically significant association with the SNPs and CCLR status. Two cumulative genome scans were performed, first with 97 microsatellites (MSATs) and then, in a collaborative effort with UC-Davis, an additional 320 MSATs were used (MSAT interval approximately every 6.7 cM). Initial results indicate CCLR status association to seven chromosomes that had 4 or more markers with statistical significance; chromosomes 3, 5, 10, 14, 18, 23, and 27. Fine mapping these chromosomal regions should further narrow the list of potential CCLR candidate genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207