MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1503330830 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab48

48 EFFECT OF INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-1 SUPPLEMENT TO NCSU-23 MEDIUM ON PREIMPLANTATION DEVELOPMENT OF PORCINE EMBRYOS DERIVED FROM IN VITRO FERTILIZATION AND SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER

2004· article· en· W1503330830 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sungjun Kim, Dong‐Hyun Nam, Youyoung Jung, Heung‐Sik Kim, S.H. Lee, Garin Lee, Sang Hwan Hyun, D.Y. Kim, Sung Keun Kang, B.C. Lee, Woo Suk Hwang

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsBlastocystAndrologyInner cell massBiologySomatic cell nuclear transferEmbryoInsulin-like growth factorOocyteHuman fertilizationEmbryo cultureEmbryo transferGrowth factorIn vitro fertilisationEmbryogenesisIn vitro maturationAutocrine signallingCell biologyCell cultureAnatomyGeneticsReceptorMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The developmental potential of in vitro production of embryos is affected by various factors, including the culture system, oocyte quality, the presence of serum, and embryo paracrine and autocrine growth factors. Insulin-like growth factor is a good stimulator of oocyte maturation and embryo development. The present study investigated the effect of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) supplement on the preimplantation development of porcine embryos derived from in vitro fertilization (IVF) and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Developmental competence was evaluated by monitoring the numbers of 2-cell embryos and blastocysts at Days 2 and 7, respectively. The number of total cells and inner cell mass (ICM) cells in blastocysts were counted after differential staining at Day 7. All data were analyzed by ANOVA using a Generalized Linear Model (SAS). In Experiment 1, a total of 2,462 in vitro-matured oocytes (527, 458, 498, 481 and 498, respectively) were inseminated with frozen-thawed boar semen and subsequently cultured in North Carolina State University (NCSU)-23 medium supplemented with various concentrations of IGF-1 (0, 1, 10, 50 and 100 ng mL-1). As a result, significant model effects on the development to the 2-cell stage (P = 0.033) and to the blastocyst stage (P = 0.0067) were found, and more blastocysts (16.9, 16.6, 17.5, 21.8 and 14.7 %, respectively) were obtained in medium supplemented with 50 ng mL-1 of IGF-I. Moreover, increase in the total cell number (56.5, 53.2, 74.0, 76.4 and 58.4) and ICM (6.6, 5.8, 9.3, 9.4 and 6.1) cells was observed in IVF embryos cultured in NCSU-23 medium supplemented with 50 ng mL-1 IGF-1. In Experiment 2, porcine cloned embryos were produced by our standard protocol using fetal fibroblasts as donor cells (Hyun SH et al., 2003 Theriogenology 59, 1641–1649) and cultured in NCSU-23 supplemented with the same concentration of IGF-1 as Experiment 1. As a result, a total of 501 reconstructed oocytes (99, 98, 102, 99 and 96, respectively) were cultured and significant model effects on the development to the 2-cell stage (P = 0.0179) were found. More blastocysts (10.5, 11.2, 11.8, 20.8 and 10.1%) were produced when embryos were cultured in NCSU-23 medium supplemented with 50 ng mL-1, even though no statistical significance was found (P = 0.1182). Increases in the total cell number (42.7, 46.0, 45.9, 51.1 and 38.2) and ICM cells (3.8, 3.8, 5.6, 6.6 and 4.8, respectively) were observed in cloned embryos cultured in NCSU-23 medium supplemented with 50 ng mL-1 of IGF-I. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that IGF-1 at the concentration of 50 ng mL-1 improves the development of preimplantion embryos derived from IVF and SCNT. This study was supported by the Advanced Backbone IT Technology Development (IMT 2000-C1-1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207