La réforme de la filiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sommaire : Dossier thématique : "la réforme de la filiation" La réforme du droit de la filiation : 2005-2009, Yann FAVIER, Muriel REBOURG La filiation par ordonnance : présentation générale de la réforme, Frédérique Granet-Lambrechts La preuve de la filiation : le droit et la vérité des filiations, Yann Favier Filiation et autorité parentale à l'épreuve des nouvelles configurations familiales, Muriel REBOURG Les incidences de la réforme de la filiation sur le nom de famille, Agnès LOUIS-PECHA la filiation en droit anglais, Thérèse CALLAS La filiation éclatée. Pour une analyse des revendications actuelles, Gilles SERAPHIN La question de la paternité à la lumière des écrits de Pierre Legendre : aspects mythologiques, juridiques et symboliques, Pascal DAVID TRAVAUX Equilibre et déséquilibre des comptes amoureux contemporains : le revenu familial remis en question. L'exemple québécois, Hélène BELLEAU, Raphaëlle PROUXL La sortie au théatre à travers les générations. Les transmissions familiales en questions, Aurélien DJAKOUANE Les écrits de jeunes en quête de statut, Nathalie GUIMARD, Juliette PETIT-GATS Le statut juridique de l'épouse au Japon : la question de l'égalité, Isabelle KONUMA DISCUSSION La parenté : Laurent BARRY, par Gilles SERAHIN Réponse de l'auteur
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".