MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1503623373 · doi:10.12957/rqi.2015.16906

Embedding free versus slave labor regulation in thetransatlantic British Empire and the United States, 1835-1860 / Incorporação livre versus trabalho escravo no regulamento transatlantico do Império Britânico e dos Estados Unidos, 1835-1860

2015· article· pt· W1503623373 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tony Freyer

Bibliographic record

VenueREVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Labor and Employment Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisdictionContext (archaeology)Political scienceImmigrationEmpireSociologyEconomic historyLawHumanitiesPolitical economyGeographyHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2015.16906 Trabalho enviado em 26 de abril de 2015. Aceito em 25 de maio de 2015 Abstract This study problematizes the historical perspective of jurisdiction specific legal analysis by examining the international context of the development of national labor regulatory regimes in the United States and the United Kingdom during the transatlantic immigrant and antislavery crises in the mid-nineteenth century. 2 This period is critical because of the desperate pressure these crises placed on large sources of labor at the bottom of society, poor immigrants and slaves. Starvation and enslavement compelled unprecedented migrations across national borders and within countries to different regions. The mobility of the populations brought them into contact with diverse forms of governance, from the regional differences within the balance of American federalism, to the competing national identities of the English, Irish and Canadian components of the British Empire. As a result, the transatlantic and intercontinental migrations are a particularly useful example for illustrating the importance of international context in the development of the law because of the different ways each governmental body responded to the social pressures. This study shows how the multiple and complex intergovernmental regulatory networks relating to the mobility of this labor force developed in an international context, not solely within the development of isolated national legal systems. 3 Keywords : Migration; jurisdiction, anti-slavery; international context; regulatory regimes; mobility Resumo Este estudo problematiza a perspectiva histórica da análise jurídica especificada jurisdição, examinando o contexto internacional do desenvolvimento nacional do trabalho de regimes reguladores nos Estados Unidos e no Reino Unido durante a imigração transatlântica e a crise abolicionista em meados do século XIX. Esse período é crítico devido à pressão desesperada que essas crises colocaram em grandes fontes de trabalho na base da hierarquia da sociedade, imigrantes pobres e escravos. A fome e a escravidão obrigaram migrações sem precedentes através das fronteiras nacionais e dentro dos países em diferentes regiões. A mobilidade das populações a pôs em contato com diversas formas de governança, a partir das diferenças regionais no equilíbrio do federalismo americano, para as concorrentes identidades nacionais dos ingleses, irlandeses e canadenses componentes do Império Britânico. Como resultado, as migrações transatlânticas e intercontinentais são um exemplo particularmente útil para ilustrar a importância do contexto internacional no desenvolvimento da lei por causa dos diferentes modos como cada órgão governamental respondeu às pressões sociais. Este estudo mostra como as múltiplas e complexas redes reguladoras intergovernamentais em matéria de mobilidade dessa força de trabalho se desenvolveram em um contexto internacional, não apenas no âmbito do desenvolvimento dos sistemas jurídicos nacionais isolados. Palavras-chave: Migrações; jurisdição; anti escravidão; contexto internacional; regimes reguladores; mobilidade

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueREVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS→Same topicInternational Labor and Employment Law→French-language works237,207→