MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1503750180 · doi:10.1002/cncr.25117

Long‐term outcomes for patients with limited stage follicular lymphoma

2010· article· en· W1503750180 on OpenAlexaff
Belinda A. Campbell, Nick Voss, Ryan Woods, Randy D. Gascoyne, James Morris, Tom Pickles, Joseph M. Connors, Kerry J. Savage

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStage (stratigraphy)Lymph nodeFollicular lymphomaInternal medicineLymphomaFollicular phaseRadiation therapyB symptomsLymphSurvival rateGastroenterologySurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Given the indolent behavior of follicular lymphoma (FL), it is controversial whether limited stage FL can be cured using radiotherapy (RT). Furthermore, the optimal RT field size is unclear. The authors of this report investigated the long‐term outcomes of patients with limited stage FL who received RT alone and studied the impact of reducing the RT field size from involved regional RT (IRRT) to involved node RT with margins up to 5 cm (INRT≤5 cm). METHODS: Eligible patients had limited stage, grade 1 through 3A FL diagnosed between 1986 and 2006 and treated were with curative‐intent RT alone. IRRT encompassed the involved lymph node group plus ≥1 adjacent, uninvolved lymph node group(s). INRT≤5 cm covered the involved lymph node(s) with margins ≤5 cm. RESULTS: In total, 237 patients were identified (median follow‐up, 7.3 years) and included 48% men, 54% aged >60 years, stage IA disease in 76% of patients, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in 7% of patients, grade 3A tumors in 12% of patients, and lymph node size ≥5 cm in 19% of patients. The 2 RT groups were IRRT (142 patients; 60%) and INRT≤5 cm (95 patients; 40%). At 10 years, the progression‐free survival (PFS) rate was 49%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 66%. Only 2 patients developed recurrent disease beyond 10 years. The most common pattern of first failure was a distant recurrence only, which developed in 38% of patients who received IRRT and in 32% of patients who received INRT≤5 cm. After INRT≤5 cm, 1% of patients had a regional‐only recurrence. Significant risk factors for PFS were lymph nodes ≥5 cm (P = .008) and male gender (P = .042). Risk factors for OS were age >60 years (P < .001), elevated LDH (P = .007), lymph nodes ≥5 cm (P = .016), and grade 3A tumors (P = .036). RT field size did not have an impact on PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: Disease recurrence after 10 years was uncommon in patients who had limited stage FL, suggesting that a cure is possible. Reducing RT fields to INRT≤5 cm did not compromise long‐term outcomes. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207