MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1503846921 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab41

41 EFFECTS OF MATURATION PERIOD OF PORCINE OOCYTES ON DEVELOPMENT FOLLOWING SOMATIC CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER

2004· article· en· W1503846921 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Hoelker, P.M. Petersen, Erika Lemme, Andrea Lucas‐Hahn, H. Niemann

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersInternational Council for Canadian StudiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsBlastocystAndrologyOocyteEmbryoSomatic cell nuclear transferFollicular fluidEquine chorionic gonadotropinHuman chorionic gonadotropinBiologyEmbryogenesisMaturation promoting factorSomatic cellFetusGonadotropinInternal medicineChemistryEndocrinologyHormoneCell biologyCellMedicinePregnancyBiochemistryGeneticsOvulationCell cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite intensive research, porcine nuclear transfer is still characterized by low success rates. To determine the effect of maturation period of porcine oocytes on subsequent development following nuclear transfer, we investigated fusion rate, induction of activation and development to blastocyst stage of somatic cells. For this we used MII-oocytes after 38, 40, and 42 h of maturation culture as recipients. Oocytes surrounded by a compact cumulus mass were selected and placed into North Carolina State University (NCSU) 37 oocyte maturation medium supplemented with 0.1 mg mL-1 cysteine, 10 ng mL-1 epidermal growth factor, 10% porcine follicular fluid, 50 µm 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 mg mL-1 cAMP, 10 IU each of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for 22 h in humidified air with 5% CO2 at 38.5°C. Subsequently the oocytes were moved to fresh NCSU37 maturation medium without cAMP, eCG and hCG and incubated for an additional 16, 18, and 20 h. In the first experiment, a total of 878 MII-arrested oocytes were enucleated, fused with pig fetal fibroblasts in calcium-free medium and activated approximately 3 h later with an electrical stimulus. This was followed by incubation in 6-dimethylaminopurine for 3 h and subsequent analysis of development in vitro. Maturation period had no effect on the frequencies of fusion (87% v. 75% v. 84%, respectively), and cleavage (82% v. 81% v. 87%, respectively), but when MII-oocytes recovered at 40 h of maturation were used as recipients, 41/279 (14,8%) the numbers of cloned embryos developing to the blastocyst stage on Day 7 of culture was significantly (ANOVA followed by multiple pairwise comparisons using Tukey test, 6 replicates, P < 0,05) higher than those of embryos reconstituted with oocytes collected at 38 h (27/285, 9.6%) and 42 h (16/314, 4.9%). In the second experiment, reconstructed embryos derived from oocytes matured for 40 h were surgically transferred to the oviducts of synchronized German Landrace gilts. Transfers were made on the first day of standing oestrus within 3 h of activation to assess their development in vivo. Synchronization was achieved by injections of 1500 IU eCG followed by 500 IU hCG 3 days later. Of 4 recipients receiving an average of 150 zygotes (range, 136 to 163), 2 became pregnant as determined by ultrasound between Days 25 and 35 of gestation. Of the two pregnant recipients, one subsequently farrowed 4 piglets on Day 115 of pregnancy. These results indicate that the maturation period is critical and affects development of porcine nuclear transfer embryos. This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; SFB265).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207