Hip-hop(e): the cultural practice and critical pedagogy of international hip-hop
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Michael Viola/Brad J. Porfilio: Hip-Hop(e): Introduction: Cultural Practice and Critical Pedagogy of International Hip-Hop - Muna Jamil Shami: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Possibility: Arab American Hip-Hop and Spoken Word as Cultural Action for Freedom - J. Lorenzo Perillo: An Empire State of Mind: Hip-Hop Dance in the Philippines - Ove Sernhede/Johan Soderman: Hip-Hop in Sweden - Folkbildning and a Voice for Marginalized Youth - Leslee Grey: True Fuckin' Playas: Queering Hip-Hop through Drag Performance - Michael B. MacDonald: Hip-Hop Citizens: Local Hip-Hop and the Production of Democratic Grassroots Change in Alberta - Brad J. Porfilio/Shannon M. Porfilio: Hip-Hop Pedagogues: Youth as a Site of Critique, Resistance, and Transformation in France and in the Neoliberal Social World - Crystal Leigh Endsley/Marla Jaksch: Troubadour: K'Naan, East Africa, and the Trans-National Pedagogy of Hip-Hop - Michael Viola: Hip-Hop and Critical Revolutionary Pedagogy: Blue Scholarship to Challenge The Miseducation of the Filipino - Darius Prier: Public Enemies: Constructing the Problem of Black Masculinity in Urban Public Schools - Brian Lozenski: Rebellion Politik: A Tale of Critical Resistance through Hip-Hop from St. Paul to Havana - Travis L. Gosa/Tristan G. Fields: Is Hip-Hop Education Another Hustle? (Ir)Responsible Use of Hip-Hop as Pedagogy - Lisa William-White/Dana Muccular/Gary Muccular: Reading, Writing, and Revolution: Spoken Word as Radical Literocratic Praxis in the Community College Classroom - Debangshu Roychoudhury/Lauren M. Garder: Taking Back Our Minds: Hip-Hop Psychology's (HHP) Call for a Renaissance, Action, and Liberatory Use of Psychology in Education - Jeremy Bryan: R.U.N.M.C. (Are You an Emcee?) or Rhetoric Used Now to Make Change - Akesha Horton: Hip-Hop as a Global Passport: Examining Global Citizenship and Digital Literacies through Hip-Hop Culture - Don C. Sawyer III: Stupid Fresh: Hip-Hop Culture, Perceived Anti-Intellectualism, and Young Black Males - Decoteau J. Irby/Emery Petchauer: Hustlin' Consciousness: Critical Education Using Hip-Hop Modes of Knowledge Distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".