De la traduction comme vecteur clandestin de la rédemption : Franz Rosenzweig ou l’utopie messianique en l’absence de Dieu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude se propose d’examiner les multiples facettes de la théorie de la traduction élaborée par Franz Rosenzweig, à la lumière notamment de son postulat paradoxal selon lequel il n’existe qu’une seule et unique langue qui cependant se réalise et se peut retracer dans chacune des langues, quel que soit le stade ou le degré de leur évolution. Ce postulat est mis à l’épreuve au gré des diverses remarques, observations et notes critiques jalonnant le travail de traduction auquel Rosenzweig s’est lui-même livré, tout spécialement sa traduction d’hymnes et de poèmes de Jehuda Halévi ainsi que sa collaboration avec Martin Buber à une Verdeutschung de la Bible hébraïque. Ce labeur reçoit enfin un éclairage sans doute plus étonnant, mais néanmoins convaincant, en le replaçant dans l’horizon de l’eschatologie messianique qui sous-tend le propos de Rosenzweig, qui fait de la traduction un vecteur de la rédemption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".