MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1504663360 · doi:10.7202/000380ar

Assessment of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei) resistance genes in Turkish barley varieties

2009· article· en· W1504663360 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmet Zeybek, Şahin Dere, Gülay Gök, Asude Çallak, Mahinur S. Akkaya

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoprotection · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlumeria graminisPowdery mildewBiologyHordeum vulgareGeneBotanyHorticulturePlant disease resistanceGeneticsPoaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thirty-four Turkish barley ( Hordeum vulgare ) varieties were tested for the presence of resistance genes (R-genes) to powdery mildew ( Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei ) using the “leaf segment test” with nine isolates of the fungus. The most commonly found R-gene was Mla8 , while a combination of R-genes Mlg and Ml(CP) was found in three varieties (Tokak 157/37, Beysehir 98, Konevei 98). The gene Mlh was found in four varieties (Obruk 86, Anadolu 86, Çıldır 02, Özdemir 05), while no R-gene was found in three varieties (Hamidiye 85, Yesevi 93, Bülbül 89). No clear inferences could be made for the partly-resistant varieties Gemici 7243, Yea 793.12 and Akhisar 98 using the test isolates selected, which suggests the presence of still unidentified R-genes. Overall, 10 previously characterized R-genes for powdery mildew ( Mla8 , Ml(La) , Mlg , Ml(CP) , Mlh , Mlat , Mla1 , Mlh , Mla7 , Mlra ) were present in Turkish barley varieties, along with some other(s) still to be identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoprotectionSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207