MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1505023982 · doi:10.25011/cim.v36i4.19955

The Role of Morning Basal Serum Cortisol in Assessment of Hypothalamic Pituitary-Adrenal Axis

2013· article· en· W1505023982 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Churn-Ern Yip, Samuel A. Stewart, Fatima Imran, David B. Clarke, Arati Mokashi, Stéphanie Kaiser, Syed Ali Imran

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal Hormones and Disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorningBasal (medicine)Internal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineCortisol awakening responseACTH stimulation testHydrocortisoneHypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axisAdrenocorticotropic hormoneCutoffHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The use of morning basal serum cortisol levels as an alternative to dynamic testing for assessment of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has previously been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the lower and upper cutoff values that would obviate subsequent HPA axis testing. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective study from a tertiary care endocrinology clinic was conducted, analyzing data from 106 adult individuals referred for HPA axis testing who had undergone a 0800-0900 morning basal serum cortisol test followed by a standard dose (250 μg) adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) stimulation test. The ability of morning basal serum cortisol values to predict post-ACTH 30 or 60 minute peak cortisol value of >500 or >550 nmol/L was investigated. RESULTS: A morning basal cutoff of <128 nmol/L is sufficient for predicting a post-ACTH value<550 nmol/L, and morning basal cutoff levels of >243 nmol/L and >266 nmol/L predict peak post-ACTH values of >500 and >550 nmol/L respectively, obviating the need for dynamic testing. Regression analysis further demonstrated the log-linear relationship between morning basal and peak levels, while also finding a significant decrease in peak post-ACTH levels for patients diagnosed with secondary hypothyroidism (76 nmol/L lower, p=0.003) or secondary hypogonadism (61 nmol/L lower, p=0.02). These data suggest that the risk of cortisol deficiency is significantly higher in individuals with additional pituitary insufficiencies. The odds ratios for cortisol deficiency in patients with history of isolated secondary hypothyroidism was 3.41 (p=0.015), with isolated secondary hypogonadism was 4.77 (p=0.002) and with both was 7.45 (p=0.0002). CONCLUSION: Morning basal serum cortisol levels show promise as an effective screening test for HPA insufficiency for most patients. Clinicians should consider the high probability of HPA insufficiency in patients with one or more pituitary insufficiencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicAdrenal Hormones and DisordersFrench-language works237,207