Dynamoth: A Scalable Pub/Sub Middleware for Latency-Constrained Applications in the Cloud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents Dynamoth, a dynamic, scalable, channel-based pub/sub middleware targeted at large scale, distributed and latency constrained systems. Our approach provides a software layer that balances the load generated by a high number of publishers, subscribers and messages across multiple, standard pub/sub servers that can be deployed in the Cloud. In order to optimize Cloud infrastructure usage, pub/sub servers can be added or removed as needed. Balancing takes into account the live characteristics of each channel and is done in an hierarchical manner across channels (macro) as well as within individual channels (micro) to maintain acceptable performance and low latencies despite highly varying conditions. Load monitoring is performed in an unintrusive way, and rebalancing employs a lazy approach in order to minimize its temporal impact on performance while ensuring successful and timely delivery of all messages. Extensive real-world experiments that illustrate the practicality of the approach within a massively multiplayer game setting are presented. Results indicate that with a given number of servers, Dynamoth was able to handle 60% more simultaneous clients than the consistent hashing approach, and that it was properly able to deal with highly varying conditions in the context of large workloads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".