MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1505468817 · doi:10.2307/25149446

"We No Longer Respect the Law": The Tilco Strike, Labour Injunctions, and the State

2004· article· en· W1505468817 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Joan Sangster

Bibliographic record

VenueLabour / Le Travail · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabour lawState (computer science)LawPolitical scienceEconomicsLabour economicsLaw and economicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1967 a strike of marginalized women workers in small-town Ontario became a cause celebre for the Ontario and national labour movements due to the employers’ use of an ex parte injunction to break the strike, and the trade union movement’s subsequent legal challenge to that injunction. This article explores the initial Tilco strike in Peterborough, the ensuing attempts by the labour movement to support the striking local of the Textile Workers Union of America (TWUA), the criminal trials of those arrested for disobeying the injunction, and the Ontario Royal Commission on Labour Disputes which followed, chaired by Justice Ivan Rand. These events serve as a useful window through which to view labour-capital relations in this period, particularly the way in which the “Fordist” accord was profoundly gendered. Tilco also reveals a labour movement strengthened by post-World War II industrial legality, but challenged from its own margins by dissatisfaction of the rank and file with that same industrial legality. Finally, Tilco and the ensuing battle over injunctions highlights interpretive debates in Canadian working-class history concerning the state, the legal regulation of labour, and the potential malleability of state institutions in the face of pressures for reform. Resume En 1967, une greve de travailleuses marginales dans une petite ville de l’Ontario etait devenue une cause celebre pour les mouvements ouvriers ontariens et canadiens en raison de l’injonction demandee ex parte par l’employeur pour briser la greve, ainsi que pour la contestation judiciaire subsequente du mouvement syndical a l’egard de cette injonction. Cet article permet d’analyser la greve initiale a la Tilco a Peterborough, les essais consecutifs du mouvement ouvrier pour appuyer la section locale du Syndicat des travailleurs amalgames du vetement et du textile, les proces criminels des personnes arretees pour la desobeissance a l’injonction, ainsi que la Commission royale sur les conflits industriels qui a suivit, de l’Ontario, presidee par le juge Ivan Rand. Ces evenements servent de fenetres par lesquelles on peut clairement voir les relations entre la main-d’œuvre et le capital dans cette periode, en particulier, la facon dont l’accord « fordiste » etait profondement sexiste. La greve a la Tilco revele aussi un mouvement syndical renforce par la legalite industrielle apres la Seconde Guerre mondiale, mais conteste a sa peripherie en raison de l’insatisfaction de la base syndicale avec cette legalite industrielle. Finalement, la greve a la Tilco et la bataille subsequente provoquee par les injonctions soulignent les debats interpretatifs dans l’histoire canadienne de la classe ouvriere concernant le role de l’Etat, le cadre juridique des relations ouvrieres et la malleabilite des institutions de l’Etat face a des pressions pour des reformes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLabour / Le TravailSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207