Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In multimodal narratives, the frame is an important, powerful punctuation mark: a mark that not only announces a strong pause and a change in storytelling modes and reading practices, but also renders conscious the imaginative workings of readers. It is this last point – the frame as punctuation mark that paves a passage from reading as directed subconscious to reading as open conscious seeing - that my paper explores. Introducing a stark contrast to the verbal prose in which it is embedded, the frame is a graphic mark that demands attention. It disrupts the narrative flow, intersecting and breaking the seamlessness of the verbal telling and renders less operative the directive or guiding function of its linguistic pointers. It does so to instigate parallel tellings characterized by significantly fewer narrative constraints than those imposed on readers by verbal storytelling. The frame, then, is not simply a matter of style. On the contrary, it is that graphic mark that bridges a structured, guided, directed telling and reading and a surprisingly unpredictable telling and a highly self-reflexive reading. Resume Dans les narrations multimodales, le cadre photographique est un signe de ponctuation capital: il marque non seulement une pause importante et un changement de mode de narration et de lecture, mais il permet aux lecteurs d’etre plus conscients de leur travail d’imagination. C’est ce dernier point que j’explore ici: le cadre photographique en tant que signe de ponctuation qui fait passer d’une lecture non encore consciente a une lecture comme vision consciente. Dans la mesure ou il etablit une rupture dans la prose qui l’enchâsse, le cadre photographique necessite une attention soutenue. Il perturbe le flux narratif, dont il casse la nature unie tout en embarrassant le role directeur des unites linguistiques. Le cadre photographique introduit des narrations paralleles, moins contraignantes que les signes qu’on trouve dans les narrations verbales. C’est dire que le cadre photographique n’est pas seulement une question de style. Il est au contraire un element qui sert de trait d’union entre une maniere de raconter qui guide et dirige le lecteur et une maniere de raconter plus imprevisible, doublee d’une maniere de lire plus reflechie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".