Le risque de décrochage scolaire et la perception du climat de classe chez les élèves du secondaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche s'interesse, d'une part, a la relation entre le risque de decrochage scolaire et la perception du climat de classe chez les eleves du secondaire et, d'autre part, a la verification, a titre exploratoire, de l'effet moderateur du programme d'etude sur ce lien. L'etude est menee aupres de 471 adolescents (245 garcons, 226 filles) âges de 13 a 17 ans. Les instruments de mesure utilises sont le questionnaire Decisions (Quirouette, 1988) et une adaptation du Classroom Environment Scale (Moos & Trickett, 1974). Les resultats corroborent le premier objectif de la recherche et revelent qu'une perception negative du climat de classe predit de facon significative le decrochage scolaire des adolescents au secondaire. Les resultats confirment en partie le second objectif de la recherche et montrent que les dimensions du climat de classe les plus associees au risque de decrochage sont, en ordre d'importance, l'engagement, l'affiliation, la clarte des reglements et la competition. Quant a la question des programmes d'etude, les resultats indiquent que, comparativement aux programmes d'adaptation scolaire, enrichi et regulier, le programme concentre agit comme variable moderatrice dans la relation entre la perception d'affiliation, de controle de l'enseignant et le risque de decrochage. En outre, le programme d'adaptation scolaire, comparativement au programme regulier, agit comme variable moderatrice dans la relation entre la perception d'orientation vers le travail et le risque de decrochage scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".