Phototoxicity of Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation: Evaluation of UV-Blocking Efficiency of Intraocular Lens (IOL) Materials Using Retinal Cell Culture and in vitro Bioassays~!2009-06-08~!2010-02-10~!2010-03-26~!
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work involves the evaluation of UV blocking efficiency of commercially available intraocular lens (IOL) materials using a retinal cell culture and a biological in vitro model that was developed in a previous study, as an effort to examine the sensitivity of this in vitro approach for evaluating toxicity of UV radiation on the retinal pigment epithelial cells. The human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell line, ARPE-19, was cultured, and cells were irradiated with broadband UVB radiations at energy levels of 0.2 and 0.4 J/cm . Some treated cells were not shielded from the radiation while others were shielded using two thicknesses (0.9 and 1.5 mm) of IOL material. After irradiation, cellular viability, mitochondrial distribution, nuclei morphology, and phagocytotic activity were analyzed using the Alamar blue assay, Rhodamine 123 staining, the Hoechst assay, and a phagocytotic activity assay. The results demonstrate that UVB radiation can cause significant decreases in RPE cell viability as well as in phagocytotic activity. Also, the results show that UVB radiation can induce the degradation of DNA and mitochondria in cultured RPE cells. However, the two different thickness IOL material sheets (0.9 and 1.5 mm) showed very effective UV blocking ability, allowing no cellular damage at all. Thus, the finding suggest that these four assays together can be used as a sensitive, and meaningful in vitro biomarker method for evaluating toxicity of UV radiation on RPE cells, and also for examining IOL effectiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".