Long Survival in Dissecting Aneurysm of the Ascending Aorta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dissecting aneurysm of the aorta, more recently known as aortic distio is a highly lethal COflditiofl. 1 With the availability improved diagnostic modalities, medical and surgical therapy since 1960, the survical has improved significantly.23. Hc was started on antihypertensive trcat ment to which he responded well. However, after one year he was operated on at Toronto ()fl November 27, 1981. The diagnosis of Aortic dissection ascending aorta (Type II) was conf irmed. He underwent aortic valve replacement and ascending aortic graft with reimplantation of both coronary arteries. Discussion: Najafi uses the term Anterior fir the proxi- mal and posterior for distal dissections. As shown figure 1(A) the intimal tear is very well seen just distal to the aortlc valve and dye is seen entering into the huge, dilated false lumen. The results of surgery depend upon acuteness of the process and replacement of the aoitic arch versus replacement of the ascending aorta. In the series of Cachera et al 9 there 0% hospital mortality for stable Pat1C1tS while 24% fbr acutely ill patients. The presence of shock, tamponade, C.V.A. or renal failure diti not correlate with hospital niorta1it 1 0
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".