MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506300014 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.176.7.4066

EphA Receptors Inhibit Anti-CD3-Induced Apoptosis in Thymocytes

2006· article· en· W1506300014 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Freywald, Nigel Sharfe, Charlotte D’E. Miller, Cher Rashotte, Chaim M. Roifman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEphrinErythropoietin-producing hepatocellular (Eph) receptorCell biologyReceptor tyrosine kinaseThymocyteBiologyReceptorCD8T-cell receptorCD3T cellSignal transductionImmunologyImmune systemBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The EphA receptor tyrosine kinases interact with membrane-bound ligands of the ephrin-A subfamily. Interaction induces EphA receptor oligomerization, tyrosine phosphorylation, and, as a result, EphA receptor signaling. EphA receptors have been shown to regulate cell survival, migration, and cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. However, their functions in lymphoid cells are only beginning to be described. We show in this study that functional EphA receptors are expressed by murine thymocytes, including CD4(+)CD8(+), CD4(+)CD8(-), and CD4(-)CD8(+) subpopulations. We demonstrate that activation of EphA receptors by the ephrin-A1 ligand inhibits the anti-CD3-induced apoptosis of CD4(+)CD8(+) double-positive thymocytes. Furthermore, ephrin-A1 costimulation suppresses up-regulation of both the IL-2R alpha-chain (CD25) and early activation Ag CD69 and can block IL-2 production by CD4(+) single-positive cells. In agreement, EphA receptor activation in thymocytes also inhibits TCR-induced activation of the Ras-MAPK pathway. Our findings suggest that EphA receptor activation is antithetical to TCR signaling in thymocytes, and that the level of engagement by ephrin-A proteins on thymic APCs regulates thymocyte selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingFrench-language works237,207