La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise au-delà du fonctionnalisme : un cadre d’analyse pluraliste de l’interface entreprise - société
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(VF)Cet article propose un cadre d’analyse renouvelé de la Responsabilité Sociale de l’Entreprise (RSE), afin de faciliter le développement de perspectives de recherches alternatives au paradigme fonctionnaliste. Ce modèle articule quatre perspectives alternatives sur l’interface entreprise / société auxquelles correspondent quatre approches de la RSE : la RSE comme fonction de régulation sociale, la RSE comme relation de pouvoir, la RSE comme produit culturel et enfin la RSE comme construction sociocognitive. L’article démontre l’intérêt de ce cadre d’analyse pluraliste pour dé-fonctionnaliser la littérature sur les relations entreprise / société, et faire émerger de nouvelles questions de recherche sur la RSE.(VA)This paper proposes a new framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) that aims at moving the Business and Society research field beyond the dominant functionalist paradigm. Burrell and Morgan’s (1979) grid of analysis is mobilized to develop an alternative framework for CSR. This framework distinguishes four perspectives on the corporation- society interface which give rise to four approaches to CSR: CSR as a social regulatory function, CSR as a power relationship, CSR as a cultural product and CSR as a sociocognitive construction. The article shows how the framework can be used to “de-functionalize” research on the corporation-society interface, account for the most recent conceptual developments in the CSR field, and construct a renewed research agenda for CSR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".