Growth of common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in cages suspended from rafts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two ongrowing experiments were conducted using a raft deployed for rearing mussels during summer and winter in the Ria of Vigo, Galicia, NW Spain. Two 3 m x 1.5 m x 6 m galvanized iron ongrowing cages were suspended from this platform, each equipped with dens constructed from PVC pipe. Small common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) were captured by the small-scale creel fishery in the ria and placed in one of two sex-specific experimental cages. Specimens were fed a standard diet (fish, decapod crustacean and mussels) at a daily feeding rate of 5% of the total weight of the animals in each cage. Due to the very high mortality as a result of decreased salinity in the winter experiment and spawning during the summer experiment, only data from the first 75 days of each experiment were compared. Growth rates were significantly higher in summer than in winter for both sexes, which was probably due to higher ambient culture temperatures during summer. Mortality was also higher during summer than winter. It was concluded that culture of common octopus on mussel rafts may be viable, especially if problems related to salinity, the acquisition of specimens from the wild and losses due to spawning can be reduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".