MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507083333 · doi:10.25011/cim.v31i5.4878

Developing a clinician-scientist career

2008· article· en· W1507083333 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Isabella T. Tai

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourNoticePleasureMedical educationMedicineGraduate studentsPsychologyPolitical scienceLawPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It was a pleasure and an honour to be invited to participate in this year’s CSCI symposium “Clinician Investigators: Pathway to Future Success”. Looking out into the audience, it was satisfying to see the room filled with so many trainees representing the various MD/PhD and CIP programs across Canada. As the first female graduate of University of Toronto’s MD/PhD program, it was also very encouraging to notice the large numbers of female trainees attending this conference. The following is a short synopsis of some key elements to consider as one transitions into a junior faculty position.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.048
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0480.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.009
Scholarly communication0.0290.015
Open science0.0030.027
Research integrity0.0090.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.733
GPT teacher head0.530
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207